<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Robin Good's Master New Media - Latest Comments in Online Ad Optimization: YieldBuild Explains Itself - Paul Edmondson Video Interview</title><link>http://robingood.disqus.com/</link><description>Professional Online Publishing: New Media Trends, Communication Skills, Online Marketing</description><atom:link href="https://robingood.disqus.com/online_ad_optimization_yieldbuild_explains_itself_paul_edmondson_video_interview_01/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:15:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Online Ad Optimization: YieldBuild Explains Itself - Paul Edmondson Video Interview</title><link>http://www.masternewmedia.org/online_ad_optimization_yieldbuild_explains_itself_-/#comment-7623192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm terribly curious about experiences that publishers have had with the various alternatives out there for optimizing multiple forms of advertising (direct and ad-network alike) across multiple web sites.....PubMatic, Rubicon Project, and YieldBuild are certainly the major players but are there others worth considering?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In general, these days we have to get the absolute maximum we possibly can for each impression, get as close to a 100% fill rate as we can, and spend the least amount of time/brainpower on the task in the process! These things have always been true but the extreme pressure of falling eCPMs &amp;amp; fill rates has focused the problem like a laser beam IMHO....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dalaixerces</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>