-
Website
http://www.masternewmedia.org -
Original page
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2008/01/28/google_penalization_matt_cutts_updated.htm -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
powen
4 comments · 1 points
-
mikepower
3 comments · 1 points
-
davidorban
3 comments · 2 points
-
Cathy_WynSculley
3 comments · 1 points
-
Mike Chelen
13 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Free Screencasting Tools: Guide To The Best Tools To Record Your Screen
2 days ago · 2 comments
-
Send Large Files Of Any Size: Guide To The Best Tools And Services To Transfer Large Files
1 week ago · 3 comments
-
Social Media Meets Online Television: Social TV Is Next
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
P2P And The Social Cloud - The Emergence Of Peer Economic Systems - Part 1
2 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Browser Compatibility Testing Guide: The Best Tools And Services To Check How Others See Your Web Site
3 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Free Screencasting Tools: Guide To The Best Tools To Record Your Screen
but you said, "1) If you have text links - wipe them out of sight. Better yet to kill them completely."
Are you saying that any site I link to out of the goodness of my own heart should be be removed? Has it gotten this bad?
What if it's a banner/button? Is that any different than a text link in the end (anchor text not withstanding)?
I find this all rather hypocritical on google's part. How do they make all their money? Advertising? And they pay people to put those adds on their site, but we can't do it ourselves?
It seems google has become MS in the world of search engines and will slap anyone that tries to make income the same way they do. Sounds like we all should be using YAHOO!! ;)
I understand google's desire to give the user good content but they allow tons of robot produced sites to still get SERPs. They seem very good at finding what they want but getting rid of these sites that have no content, lots of adsense, and links directing you to where you really want to go flurish. . .
However, I'm frustrated as can be at the Google smack down. Why? Because I signed up with Google ads in 2004 (?) and it took 4 years (YEARS) to reach the $100 payout. In the same breath, let me add that I can make $8,000 a year with other companies.
Of course I'd love my page rank back... But it's a catch-22 situation for me. Google owns the page rank world and advertisers want a high page rank in order to pay decently for posts, yet Google smacked my page rank because of those said-posts.
Vicious Circle. And yes I want my page rank back... so I can get high paying advertisers. I may get the SAME TRAFFIC as a PR 4 or 5 site but advertisers see a zero and "assume" it's really a zero site when it's not.
Sigh.
Thank you
I am so very happy to hear this!
Cheers to you!
Robin